Skip to Main Content
“Haruka Takahashi” (
heartsink
) wrote
2013
-
02
-
05
08:13 am
phone
you have reached the automated voice mailbox of
user number: one nine four five nine one three
please leave your message after the tone.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 05:38 am (UTC)
(
link
)
you can tell exactly what my reaction was from a few texts?
anyways whatever this isn't about me. you didn't say how you're doing
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 05:42 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Text doesn't hide as much as you think it does.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 05:43 am (UTC)
(
link
)
there's nothing to hide
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 05:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
There always is.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 05:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
why do you think that
if you want to say
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 05:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Isn't it obvious?
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 05:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
obviously not if i just asked
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 05:57 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Excluding yourself, name the people you know who are exactly as they appear on the surface. No secrets, no hidden qualities. No embarrassing anecdotes. No feelings of grief. No unrequited romances.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 05:59 am (UTC)
(
link
)
i would argue that like 75% of that list wouldn't count as a deep dark secret
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:01 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Any of those could get a person killed.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
there are probably like 29834928374+ things that could get a person killed. are all of them deep dark secrets?
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:10 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You don't understand people very well, do you?
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:14 am (UTC)
(
link
)
it's fine if that's what you think but you've misunderstood me too
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:16 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Deliberately insulting, to be technical.
But it isn't kind to be dismissive of the types of secrets someone might hold, if you want them revealed to you.
You understand that much.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:17 am (UTC)
(
link
)
was i being dismissive?
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:21 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You are.
(´ー
♡
) But I suppose if you've never had a secret of your own, you can't understand how important they are to those around you.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
i never said they weren't important
not thinking they're deep and dark doesn't mean i think they aren't important
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:28 am (UTC)
(
link
)
If not deep or dark, what are they? Shallow and lighthearted?
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:29 am (UTC)
(
link
)
you make it sound like there are only two options for each!
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:30 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You make it sound like a secret must meet some arbitrary quality to deserve being one worth keeping.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:31 am (UTC)
(
link
)
when did i say something even similar to that
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:32 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You wouldn't answer my question before.
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:33 am (UTC)
(
link
)
which question
no subject
heartsink
2013-12-17 06:36 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I asked you to name someone without secrets.
Instead, you argued over what counts as a "deep dark secret."
Is it because you can't find an answer?
no subject
quackery
2013-12-17 06:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
one of my friends back home
[ahiru he was literally a character from a book that doesn't count]
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 06:41 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 06:43 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 06:46 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 06:47 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 06:49 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 06:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 06:52 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 06:56 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 06:59 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 07:01 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-17 08:10 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-17 22:50 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 02:24 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 02:29 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 02:37 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 02:39 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 02:43 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 02:44 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 02:45 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 02:48 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 02:49 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 02:57 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 07:31 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
quackery
-
2013-12-18 07:33 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
heartsink
-
2013-12-18 07:34 (UTC)
-
Expand
347 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
anyways whatever this isn't about me. you didn't say how you're doing
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
if you want to say
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But it isn't kind to be dismissive of the types of secrets someone might hold, if you want them revealed to you.
You understand that much.
no subject
no subject
(´ー♡) But I suppose if you've never had a secret of your own, you can't understand how important they are to those around you.
no subject
not thinking they're deep and dark doesn't mean i think they aren't important
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Instead, you argued over what counts as a "deep dark secret."
Is it because you can't find an answer?
no subject
[ahiru he was literally a character from a book that doesn't count]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)